CLAUDE PROMPTS

Write a 1500-word SEO blog post about [topic] targeting the primary keyword [keyword]. Structure: an opening hook that is not a question, H2 subheadings every 300 words, a FAQ section at the end with three questions, and a conclusion with a clear CTA. Tone: conversational but authoritative. Do not use listicles as the main format. Do not use phrases like delve, in conclusion, or certainly. Write like a knowledgeable human, not an AI assistant.

You are a senior software engineer conducting a code review. Review this code: [paste your code]. Provide: 1) All bugs and errors with line references, 2) Edge cases that would break this, 3) Performance or readability inefficiencies, 4) Any security vulnerabilities, 5) A corrected and refactored version of the code. For each change explain the reasoning in plain language.

Summarize the following document: [paste document]. Provide: 1) The single sentence that captures the entire document's purpose, 2) The five most important insights or arguments, 3) What the author wants the reader to believe or do after reading this, 4) What I should do differently based on this, 5) Any factual claims that should be independently verified. Document: [paste here]

I want to learn [subject or skill]. I have [X hours per week] available for [X weeks]. My current level is [beginner or intermediate]. Create a structured learning plan with: the 20 percent of concepts that deliver 80 percent of practical understanding, a week-by-week schedule, recommended free resources for each phase, and one practical project to build at the end to solidify everything. Be specific about what to study each week.

Rewrite the following text so it sounds completely human-written. Remove: passive voice, cliches, AI-typical phrases such as delve, certainly, moreover, and in conclusion, and overly formal language. Replace with: active voice, natural sentence rhythm, varied sentence lengths, and genuine personality. Keep all the original information and meaning. Show me the before and after and briefly explain the key changes. Original text: [paste here]

Act as a strategy consultant. Build a business strategy for [company or idea] operating in [market]. Include: a situation analysis covering internal strengths and external threats, three strategic options with the pros and cons of each, your recommended approach with clear reasoning, a 90-day implementation roadmap, and five KPIs to measure success. Be direct. Flag assumptions clearly.

Research the topic of [topic] and give me a comprehensive briefing. Include: a 500-word overview covering the most important things to understand, the most significant recent developments, the main debates or disagreements among experts, the two or three most credible sources or authorities in this space, and the three most surprising or counterintuitive findings you can identify. Cite reasoning for your claims.

Generate 20 unconventional ideas for [problem or goal]. Rules: exclude the first ten things that come to mind, at least five ideas must be genuinely counterintuitive or surprising, every idea must be actionable not abstract. For each idea: one sentence describing what it is, and one sentence explaining why it might work. I want ideas that make me think I would not have come up with that on my own.

Write a cover letter for a [job title] position at [company]. My background: [brief description of relevant experience]. The key requirements of the role are: [list three to five requirements]. Do not use a generic template. Write it as a specific, confident case for why I am the right person for this exact role. Lead with something interesting, not with I am writing to apply. Under 300 words. No cliches.

Give me honest, direct feedback on this work: [paste your work]. I want rigorous critique, not encouragement. Tell me: 1) The three biggest weaknesses and why they matter, 2) Anything that is unclear, unconvincing, or missing, 3) What an expert in this area would say about it, 4) A specific list of changes that would make this significantly better. Do not soften the feedback.

Write a persuasive essay arguing that [position or claim]. Length: [X words]. Audience: [describe who will read this]. Structure: a compelling opening that establishes the stakes, three to four well-supported arguments with evidence or reasoning for each, a steelman of the opposing view followed by a rebuttal, and a strong conclusion that calls for a specific belief or action. Avoid emotional manipulation. Win on logic and evidence.

I need to build [feature description] into an existing [type of application]. Current tech stack: [list technologies]. Constraints: [describe any limitations]. Walk me through: 1) The recommended technical approach with alternatives considered, 2) The data model changes required, 3) The API endpoints or functions needed, 4) Potential failure points and how to handle them, 5) A rough estimate of complexity and implementation order.

Write a compelling investor pitch narrative for [company]. Cover these elements in order: the problem and why it is significant, the solution and why it works, the market size with TAM SAM SOM, the business model and how money is made, traction to date, the team and why you are the right people, and the ask with how it will be used. Under 500 words. No filler. Every sentence must earn its place.

Write a competitive positioning statement for [company or product]. Context: our primary competitors are [list], our target customer is [describe], and our core differentiator is [describe]. The positioning statement should: be specific enough that a competitor could not claim it, resonate immediately with our target customer, and give the sales team a clear story to tell. Write three versions and explain the strategic rationale behind each.

Write a standard operating procedure for [process or task]. Include: a one-sentence purpose statement, a list of who this applies to, a list of tools or resources required, numbered step-by-step instructions written clearly enough that a new employee could follow them without help, common mistakes to avoid, and what to do if something goes wrong. Write for clarity over length.

Design a system architecture for [application description]. Requirements: [list functional requirements]. Scale: [expected user count and data volume]. Budget tier: [startup, mid-size, or enterprise]. Provide: a component diagram described in text, technology choices for each component with reasoning, database design approach, API structure overview, how you would handle authentication, and the top three architectural risks with mitigation strategies.

Conduct a thorough code review of the following as if you are a senior engineer at a high-quality engineering organization: [paste code]. Evaluate: correctness and edge cases, performance and scalability, security considerations, code readability and naming, test coverage needs, and adherence to the relevant best practices for [language or framework]. Be specific and constructive. Provide line-level comments where relevant.

Perform a security audit on this code: [paste code]. Check systematically for: SQL injection or NoSQL injection vulnerabilities, cross-site scripting possibilities, authentication and authorization weaknesses, sensitive data exposure in logs or responses, insecure dependencies, and any other OWASP Top 10 issues. For each vulnerability found: describe the risk, show the specific vulnerable code, and provide a fixed version with explanation.

Write technical documentation for: [describe the code, API, or feature]. Target audience: [junior developer, senior developer, or external API consumer]. Include: an overview of what this does and why it exists, installation or setup steps if applicable, all parameters or inputs with types and descriptions, return values or outputs, example usage with real code samples, common errors and how to handle them, and any important limitations or caveats.

Refactor this code to improve quality without changing functionality: [paste code]. Goals: improve readability through better naming and structure, reduce complexity and nesting, eliminate code duplication, apply relevant design patterns if appropriate, and improve testability. Show the refactored version and provide a summary of the changes made and the reasoning behind each significant decision.

Design a REST API for [application or feature description]. Provide: a list of all endpoints with their HTTP method, URL structure, request body, and response schema, the authentication approach, error response formats and status codes, pagination strategy for list endpoints, rate limiting approach, and any versioning strategy. Follow REST conventions and explain any deviations.

Write three different opening paragraphs for a piece about [topic]. Version 1 opens with a specific surprising statistic. Version 2 opens with a brief scene or story that illustrates the core idea. Version 3 opens with a direct and provocative claim. Each should be under 100 words and leave the reader with no choice but to keep reading.

Write a professional email for this situation: [describe the situation and context]. Desired tone: [formal, direct, or collaborative]. Goal of the email: [what you want to happen as a result]. Key points to include: [list them]. Constraints: under 200 words, a specific and informative subject line, and one clear next step as the CTA. Do not use filler openings like I hope this finds you well.

Edit the following text by cutting it by at least 30 percent without losing any of the key information. Rules: eliminate every redundant phrase, cut every sentence that does not add new information, replace wordy constructions with direct ones, and shorten or remove any examples that are not essential. Show me the edited version followed by a brief note on what was cut and why. Original: [paste here]

Write a [X]-minute keynote speech about [topic] for [audience]. Structure: an opening that does not begin with a self-introduction, a central thesis stated clearly within the first two minutes, three supporting points each anchored with a specific story or example, a transition that connects back to the opening, and a closing call to action or challenge. Write the full speech, not an outline. Aim for spoken language, not written language.

Write a complete weekly newsletter issue for [brand or topic]. Sections: 1) A personal opener in two to three sentences that is conversational and specific, 2) One main piece of insight, analysis, or story around 300 words, 3) Three curated recommendations with a one-sentence reason for each, 4) A single question to prompt replies from readers. Write in the voice of a smart, direct friend sharing something they genuinely found useful this week.

Explain [complex topic] to someone with no background in this area. Use: a concrete real-world analogy to something most people already understand, a specific example that illustrates the core idea, a breakdown of the three to five foundational concepts in order of importance, the most common misconception beginners have, and a one-sentence summary that captures the essence. Define any technical terms you use.

Summarize this academic content for study purposes: [paste content]. Provide: the central thesis or main argument in one sentence, the five key concepts I must understand, how these concepts relate to each other, three exam-style questions this content is likely to generate, and a distinction between what I need to memorize versus what I need to understand conceptually.

Help me plan an essay on [topic]. My assignment is: [describe the prompt or task]. My current thinking is: [describe your position or argument]. Provide: a refined thesis statement that is specific and arguable, an essay structure with three to five main sections each with a clear purpose, the strongest evidence or reasoning for each section, the most important counterargument and how to address it, and the logical progression from introduction to conclusion.

Build a study plan for [exam, course, or subject] with [X weeks] remaining. I have [X hours per day] available. Topics to cover: [list]. My weakest areas are: [list]. Provide a week-by-week schedule that prioritizes weak areas first, specific daily session plans for the first week, a revision strategy for the final week before the exam, and three study techniques suited to this type of material.

I am writing a research paper on [topic] for [course or level]. My current research question is: [state it]. Help me: 1) Evaluate whether my research question is specific, original, and answerable, 2) Identify the main academic debates or schools of thought relevant to this topic, 3) Suggest what types of sources I need and why, 4) Recommend five specific search terms for academic databases, 5) Propose a thesis statement based on my current question.